Article: 262094 of talk.bizarre
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
From: (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: horndog mail, posted for your perusal
Message-ID: <>
Organization: Institute for Boatanchor Studies
References: <4a5l7n$>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 21:55:29 GMT
Lines: 20
Status: O

In article <4a5l7n$> (Meredith Tanner) writes:
>> Date:          Wed, 6 Dec 1995 20:50:31 -0600 (CST)
>> From:          patterson chris <>
>> To:            Meredith Tanner <>
>> Subject:       Re: Real life intrudes 
>> Hot pants... shame shame shame...send picture
>what a charmer.

Is it my imagination, or overall is the quality of unsolicited horndog
mail from women much better than that from men?  I mean, at the very
least, I have never received an incoherent message from a woman which
offered something incomprehensible, and I seem to get them from men on
a fairly regular basis.  And I am straight.  At the very least, I would
expect a stronger standard of literacy.
"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."