Article: 262094 of talk.bizarre
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
From: kludge@netcom.com (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: horndog mail, posted for your perusal
Message-ID: <kludgeDJ8KwH.JEB@netcom.com>
Organization: Institute for Boatanchor Studies
References: <4a5l7n$1bg@shellx.best.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 21:55:29 GMT
Lines: 20
Sender: kludge@netcom10.netcom.com
Status: O
X-Status: 

In article <4a5l7n$1bg@shellx.best.com> merde@shellx.best.com (Meredith Tanner) writes:
>
>> Date:          Wed, 6 Dec 1995 20:50:31 -0600 (CST)
>> From:          patterson chris <patte996@acc.wuacc.edu>
>> To:            Meredith Tanner <merde@shellx.best.com>
>> Subject:       Re: Real life intrudes 
>>
>> Hot pants... shame shame shame...send picture
>
>what a charmer.

Is it my imagination, or overall is the quality of unsolicited horndog
mail from women much better than that from men?  I mean, at the very
least, I have never received an incoherent message from a woman which
offered something incomprehensible, and I seem to get them from men on
a fairly regular basis.  And I am straight.  At the very least, I would
expect a stronger standard of literacy.
--scott
-- 
"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."