From: firstname.lastname@example.org Newsgroups: talk.bizarre Subject: FTSD: Inter-office Memo Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 20:13:00 GMT Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. Lines: 34 Message-ID: <email@example.com> X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Dec 02 20:13:00 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0) X-Http-Proxy: 1.1 x72.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 184.108.40.206 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDzevbenmichael Beloved colleagues: In my examination of your pages, it appears that the prototype for "design objects" has not altogether served as a model for your interpretation of how the design object should be constructed. You have successfully avoided the interpellative architectonic imperative of the totalizing authority, and consequently can revel in the playful jouissance of indeterminacy. Unfortunately, despite the concession of "floating ground" serving to destabilize the binarism vulgarly thought to stand at the base of la logique ordinateuse, your recourse to stochastic emendation of the source text is not altogether compatible with the mimetic requirements of adequation. The prototype for the "design object" is as follows: <IMG BORDER="0" SRC="images/Field_Select.gif" STYLE="position: absolute; left: -25; top: 0; z-index: 6; visibility: hidden" width="19" height="19" NAME= "APBdesign02" ID="APBdesign02"> The "design object" should have its STYLE attribute of visibility set to "hidden," and should have an ID as well as a NAME. The NAME and ID should have the word "design" in them, in lowercase. Without these features, the Design feature will fail to work in scripting. The "design objects" in your files lack some or all of these features. Please do what you can to correct them. Sincerely, Jonathan Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.