Subject: Re: why English girl like french man .. From: buzzard@world.std.com (Sean T Barrett) Date: 1997/09/29 Message-Id: <EH9AF4.K2E@world.std.com> Newsgroups: talk.bizarre Mao Tse-Tung <cdick@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >that was very quick, good... and we know "cdick" could... never give even a bit of context as if his ISP were Knotts-(Don)-hexed ...and yet... with this assessment I must disagree what'er mean "quick", I do not see If it followed soon, the poster has no life! [Insert obligatory line that ends with 'wife'] Was the posting short? A fast read perhaps? 'Tis the worst kind. A fatal lapse. But you are Mao, my personal Death Star So perhaps I'll take a good look at webster: (http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary) "archaic: not stagnant, flowing"? Not very likely, that's just the net, all the same. "firey, glowing"? Perhaps 'twas a flame? "pungent or caustic"--that could be a pun on the latter as "sarcasm", though kinda dumb, of course it means "pregnant", I knew about that But that's just as relevent as a cat on a mat Maybe we'd best do this the loud way, gung-ho WE HAVEN'T A CLUE WHAT YOU MEAN, MAO TSE-TUNG, THOUGH we're not sure we wanna but now I am gonna show you my hack on LLoyd, my trick-Wood >that was very quick, good... buzzard