Subject:      Re: why English girl like french man ..
From:         buzzard@world.std.com (Sean T Barrett)
Date:         1997/09/29
Message-Id:   <EH9AF4.K2E@world.std.com>
Newsgroups:   talk.bizarre

Mao Tse-Tung  <cdick@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>that was very quick, good...
 and we know "cdick" could...
 never give even a bit of context
 as if his ISP were Knotts-(Don)-hexed

 ...and yet...

 with this assessment I must disagree
 what'er mean "quick", I do not see
 If it followed soon, the poster has no life!
 [Insert obligatory line that ends with 'wife']
 Was the posting short? A fast read perhaps?
 'Tis the worst kind. A fatal lapse.

 But you are Mao, my personal Death Star
 So perhaps I'll take a good look at webster:
 (http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary)
 "archaic: not stagnant, flowing"?  Not very
 likely, that's just the net, all the same.
 "firey, glowing"? Perhaps 'twas a flame?
 "pungent or caustic"--that could be a pun 
 on the latter as "sarcasm", though kinda dumb,
 of course it means "pregnant", I knew about that
 But that's just as relevent as a cat on a mat

 Maybe we'd best do this the loud way, gung-ho
 WE HAVEN'T A CLUE WHAT YOU MEAN, MAO TSE-TUNG, THOUGH
 we're not sure we wanna
 but now I am gonna
 show you my hack on LLoyd, my trick-Wood
>that was very quick, good...

buzzard